![]() |
The Current Intellectual Project 2009-2014 | ![]() |
|
An Intellectual Project Working on my observations and forming them as a framework for my future hypothesis on value of individuals in economic system, I was starting to my intellectual project in 1996. Being a student of international economics in I noticed that the fundamental science of economics neglected several informal cases of resource’s distribution. At the core of economic activity underlies the attempts to attract the resources for different stages of the individual life. On my opinion, the science of economics, especially in area of international political economy did not reveal completely the economic mechanism of human hierarchies. After the books of Julian Simon (Ultimate Resource) and reports of Roma Club (on possible crises in resource exhaust of humankind) my doubts about the existed science became stronger. I started to compare the situation with human development and human hierarchies (include institutions)) in different regions of the World together with the comparison of development among other biological creatures. As a result of these attempts, I focused my attention in middle 1990’s on growing consumption of humankind and organizational developments towards the process of globalization. Therefore I started to search how the innovations reflected on individual sustainability, taking into account the increasing resource consumption and more organized hierarchies (institutions). These parameters were reflected on change of the global development. I had certain difficulties with the determination of individual’s value in different economic and political systems. As a result of the critical observations the following conclusion had appeared: with individual-resource interaction there is no critical difference between capitalist, socialist or any other centralized or decentralized system in the World. PEOPLE MAKE THEIR BEST CHOICES IN DIFFERENT HUMAN HIERARCHIES. |
||||
|
|
The “HUMAN TREES” I was encountered with the difficulty of explanation for the three main methods of resource allocation. On my opinion the current books of economics do not reflects the real situation with the resource allocation throughout the World. In 1999 I decided to conceptualize all these hypotheses and to formulate a general outlook. I had tried to combine the three methods of resource allocation (the formal, informal and market allocation methods) inside the common institutional approach. As a result of this combination the “Human Trees Model (Hypothesis)” was appeared. In this hypothesis I found answers for questions of how people interact with each other. The methods of resource allocation could be applied in my opinion, both to the small human community (like a family, tribes etc.) and to the multiethnic international institutions. It is possible to clarify the movement of individuals from different geographic locations, why they tried to unite and to build the strong hierarchies. The hierarchies transformed and grown to the big institutes (both formal and informal) as a result of the resource flow. |
|||
|
STRUCTURAL CHANGES and "HUMAN TREES" At the same time, the fields of activities for hierarchies change: i.e. it is possible to classify my research as the new interpretation of the theory of the sectoral development (Clark Fisher’s Theory of Structural Change). This more detailed hypothesis explains why one hierarchy is stronger than others and how it differs from others. It is useful to note, that as organization grows up (the higher an individual climbs up the hierarchy, the more resources he can manage and concentrate in his hands), the hierarchy itself develops its economic activity upon the fulfilled function. Sectoral development of Colin Clark and Allan Fisher (as well as W.W.Rostow’s Development theory), have helped me to explain hierarchical development upwards. This institutional development started from the development of basic sectors up to the development of high technologies in the sphere of biotechnologies, space industry, IT and genetics (artificial brain is the last point of the known development). Needless to say that development itself is connected with the development of particular individuals (e.g. it is difficult to compare the development of the outstanding leaders at the beginning of the 20th and the 21st centuries). Individual development itself is reflected in my Model of “Human Trees”. On the vertical axis there is a transition of sectors (organizations attract as much resources as possible, start their development from low level of resource consumption, than by organizing, move to more productive spheres of activities). Transformation in the sphere of activity, in my opinion is precisely explained by the theory of Sectoral development (where basic sectors are transformed to industrial development, further, to service sectors and after that the sector of high technologies develops and further on, emergence of artificial intelligence (for the 21st Century) as the highest stage of human resource distribution development). In this frame, during the 2006-2008, I am planning to prepare the following publications: The World without Borders (2009). A general explanation of the Human Trees’ principles; Civilization and Azerbaijan. New independent state and developing interaction between human hierarchies (2010); Civilization and South Caucasus (2012); Civilization and Eurasia. Comparative studies of human hierarchies in Russia and China (2012); Civilization. The penetrating glance into the human development (2015). At that stage of my academic development, I intend to continue my observations of globalizing world using the frameworks of my academic specialization (Eurasian studies, international political economy, economics and international affairs). Particularly, the subtle observations of political trends in Eurasian region are the principal materials for my nearest academic projects. I hope to continue my academic perfection, using the last technological opportunities, innovations and my knowledge of foreign languages. The personal observations noted in different stages of my career in last 10 years would be another source of my academic contributions. I hope to find the adequate demand for my academic investigations, directed to the better understanding of our nearest future. |
|
|||
|
||||